Posts tagged grammar.

chambersandmalone:

Cheers, The Boys In The Bar

I started watching Cheers recently (as part of my quest to watch ALL THE TV) and I’ve been pleasantly surprised by how well it holds up and how smart the writing was. How many shows today could offer you a dangling preposition joke? 

thisistheverge:

FYI: How Do You Cite a Tweet in an Academic Paper? - Alexis Madrigal - Technology - The Atlantic

(via thenextweb)

Research and Documentation Online: How to properly cite your sources when writing papers ›

My high school english teacher gave me a link to this site during my senior year (which was six years ago and now I feel really old) but I just dug it up again to help my sister with a paper and it’s so fucking useful that I thought I’d share it with all of you.

If you ever have any questions about how to properly format citations in-text or in your bibliography according to MLA/APA standards, check this site. It has all the answers you could ever need. 

(via killams)

(via mrsvc)

maybenotboring:

And when you say nauseous, you mean nauseated.

(via theosoldblog)

(via fucknicethings)

fuckyeahlgbt:

What is a gender-neutral pronoun? What does English need a new pronoun for, anyway? Many people have expressed the need for a singular gender-neutral third-person pronoun: that is, a pronoun to use when someone’s gender is unknown or when the individual is neither male or female. Such instances occur when addressing transgender and genderqueer people who don’t feel comfortable being addressed with masculine or feminine pronouns, computers or robots with artificial intelligence, sexless fictional creatures, angels, and the God of many monotheistic religions. “He,” “she,” or “it” won’t do, “one” doesn’t work when speaking of a specific person, e.g. “Samus washed one’s dishes,” and in some cases even a singular “they” just won’t work – specifically when a name is used, e.g. “Charlie tied their shoes” or “Sam thought they were late to the party.” (For more information, check out the comprehensive links page.)

Over the centuries, hundreds of new words, or neologisms, have been proposed, with the vast majority being abandoned by all but their creators. There are a few exceptions: the pronoun “co” used by residents of the Twin Oaks Intentional Community, “zie/hir” and its derivatives used by people in the transgender/genderqueer community, and Spivak pronouns (ey/em/eir) used in the genderqueer community as well as in some text-based online games and computer textbooks. There is some valid argument by linguists that it’d be extremely difficult for the English language to pick up new pronouns at all, but in the Internet age, sometimes your only clue toward someone’s gender is a username, and, like the long-awaited adoption of the honorific “Ms.”, the need for a gender-free pronoun may overcome the barrier of language limits. (I originally found the comparison of epicene pronouns and “Ms.” in an essay by Jed Hartman.)

One of the biggest problems facing the adoption of a new gender-neutral pronoun is the lack of unity and organization among supporters of the idea. People propose new pronouns without knowing about the scores of previous ones, and people interested in using gender-neutral pronouns can’t find any they like, or can’t figure out why they like or dislike certain forms. My aim is to compare and contrast the most usable epicene pronouns, and also provide text with the pronouns inserted so those curious can see each pronoun in action. My criteria were influenced by that of the two most in-depth comparisons of gender-free pronouns I’ve found: one in the Evaluation page of the Gender-Neutral Pronoun FAQ, and the other in the Pronouns article on the Footnotes site. I’ve included a couple variations that neither of them explored, but their arguments were very influential to mine.

The title of each pronoun links to the first few pages (and concluding paragraph) of Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, available for free from Project Gutenberg. I did this not because I think Alice should be made gender-neutral, but so that the readers have the opportunity to see for themselves how each pronoun fits into a larger narrative, one many of them may already be familiar with.

This table was taken and edited from this Wikipedia page.

Read More

(via thegayaggregate)

trashhhtalk:

THIS. FUCKING THIS.

(via hbbanana)

1 year ago on 01/11/11 at 12:47pm
via avid

Common Typography Mistakes: Apostrophes Versus Quotation Marks | Tips

YOUR =/= YOU’RE
THEIR =/= THEY’RE =/= THERE
THAN =/= THEN
LOSE =/= LOOSE
CHOOSE =/= CHOSE
WEAR =/= WHERE
YOU = IDIOT

(via fuckyeahtopher)

Word wonks want ‘viral,’ 13 others banned - The Boston Globe ›

“This linguistic disease of a term must be quarantined,’’ Kuahmel Allah of Los Angeles wrote in his submission. “If one more thing goes viral, I’m buying a Hazmat suit and moving into a clean-room.’’

I think BuzzFeed might need to rewrite it’s mission statement…

1 year ago on 01/01/11 at 11:42am

raisethesilence:

credit unknown.

This needs to be printed out and displayed prominently on the walls of every classroom from preschool through college. 

1 year ago on 12/22/10 at 10:30pm

Best sentences

healywu:

Sometimes I play a game where I read random wikipedia articles until I find the best sentences of all time.  My find for the day:

One was Natural Cures “They” Don’t Want You to Know About, published in 2005. The book was criticised for containing no natural cures.

From the entry on informercialist and convicted felon Kevin Trudeau.

This is my new favorite internet based game. I’m never going to be able to read Wikipedia the same way again. 

1 year ago on 12/20/10 at 12:15pm